Several times, over the past few weeks, I have received comments (presumably from the same person) identifying a certain photographer as the force behind the M.A.L. site. As I've said before, legal considerations prevent me from revealing any unofficial "tips" as to the identity of one or more (if there are more) of the M.A.L.adies. Once the culprit(s) is/are revealed legally, you'll be the first to know.
I would note that my "helper," in making his or her case that "photographer X" is a/the M.A.L.ady, points out that he or she made the accusation in a comment to the M.A.L. blog, and had the comment censored by the M.A.L.adies. Hence, his or her suspicion that "photographer X" must be the guilty party, or else the blog would have published the comment to throw suspicion elsewhere. Unfortunatly for that conclusion, when I went through all the M.A.L. blog comments a few days ago, I found several published comments accusing "photographer X" of being responsible for the site. So, it would seem that the (singular or plural) M.A.L.adies didn't censor some accusations against that photographer -- which leads me to suspect he isn't really the culprit. Close, but no cigar.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If youre talkin about D White, i dont buy that for one second, Darren has supported Marc frequently. But the suspense is killing me, this is better than most crappy reality shows lol! Its gotta be someone with at least some sort of public visibility, i mean why would a complete nobody go balistic and lose their sanity over Marc--it has to be someone who feels Marc is a threat to their reputation.
ReplyDeleteOf course, that's the point. He allows posts with his name so you'd think just that.
ReplyDelete