I have to admit, I never thought I'd be saying something positive about the M.A.L.adies, but here it is: it appears that they have either dropped their policy of screening comments to their posts, or accidentally turned moderation off. As a result, the response to their latest "100th" post has been far heavier than their previous, moderated posts. The results speak for themselves:
The problem with your mission is that it full of lies itself. On every page I can pick out BS and clear, blatant lies. You may try to sound all "holier than thou" but any idiot can see right through your crap.
All you've done is been kicked off every single online forum which you have posted your hate to without exception. The public already knows just how insane you are.
Attacked, slandered or otherwise defamed? Isn't that your MO?...You can't claim integrity when it's quite clear you have none.
Is this blog supposed to be serious? It if it, you have way too much free time on your hands.
You were never a friend of Gary's. Gary Crabbe is an honest and respectable individual with a kind heart and great knowledge of photography. You, on the other hand, are a first class piece of s**t.
I am honestly wondering if the person who runs this site is mentally disabled, disturbed or something.
As I said, I commend the M.A.L.adies on having the courage to post these responses. Now, I can only hope they also find the wisdom to realize that their actions are accomplishing nothing except to bring themselves into disrepute, and make the smart decision to call off their ridiculous vendetta.
Keep up the great work here exposing that repulsive sicko who runs that site! And please let us know who it is soon so that we can pay 'em a personal visit.
ReplyDeleteTo set the record straight, M.A.L.L. does not endorse "vigilante justice" against the M.A.L.adies. Any punishment should be handled through the judicial system, as it's pretty clear their attacks have gone beyond protected speech and into the realm of libel against Adamus and several others. Then, again, it might be sufficient punishment to identify the person or persons behind that site, so that their own photographs can be shown to the world. I can guarantee it won't be pretty (and neither will the photographs).
ReplyDelete