I see that the M.A.L.adies are at it again. This time, they've renewed an attack on another Northwest photographer -- who shall remain nameless -- whose sexual identity they had already questioned (then pulled the comment from their website after admitting they couldn't prove their charge). But, then again, when has a lack of facts ever stopped the M.A.L.adies before? Now, they are once again describing said photographer as "an unemployed loser...and worse, a homosexual unemployed loser." (That "worse" really is telling, isn't it?)
Somehow, all this reminds me of is a right-wing talk show host in the 1960s, who asked the publisher of an "underground" magazine of the time "isn't it true your magazine is full of homosexual pornography?" The publisher's reply: "Why? Did you see something that interested you?"
Meanwhile, it's worth noting that it has been five days since the issuance of the M.A.L. Challenge, with no sign that the gutless wonders will respond by showing us their own photographs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment